Victory and Defeat

September 29, 2009

1 Samuel 7:1-17

A Sermon preached at Southminster Presbyterian Church

Where is God in victory and defeat?
That’s the question I see in this text and I’ve noticed again and again as we’ve read the Old Testament.
Is God with us when we succeed?
Is God angry with us when we fail?

Clearly the writers of the Old Testament understood it that way. When they were successful in battle, it was because of the actions of God. In this case, the Lord thundered a mighty voice that day and threw the Philistines into confusion.
But previously, the Israelites had been subject to the Philistines because they were sinning against God and worshipping Ba’al and Astarte and other false gods.
We may not have the Philistines camping outside our gates, so this battle imagery may not transfer into our lives as easily as some other biblical stories might. But consider the questions—is God with us when we succeed? And is God angry with us when we fail?

Let’s start with the failure question. Today we don’t tend to explicitly connect failure to God’s punishment. Or most of us don’t. But a number of televangelists blamed Hurricane Katrina on God’s judgment of the sinful New Orleans lifestyle. Last month, when the Lutheran Church was having their annual meeting in Minneapolis, a tornado went through town. Conservative Christian commentators blamed the tornado on God’s judgment against the Lutheran Church for considering giving more inclusion to gay and lesbian Christians in the church.

When you read the Old Testament, you can understand how such people justify their judgmentalism. But my problem is I’m not sure who appointed Pat Robertson as God’s spokesman. In the Old Testament, the prophets, like Samuel, were the ones to speak for God. But the office of prophet undergoes a change after John the Baptist. Once the Spirit descends upon Jesus and then, after his resurrection, it descends on the church, you don’t see prophets. There are apostles, disciples, teachers, evangelists, elders, and deacons, but the role of prophet is given to the church as a whole. It is disconcerting to me when people presume that their thoughts are God’s thoughts.
Most Christians don’t blame entire subgroups of humanity for natural disasters. But I have heard well meaning Christians say things to people that are just as questionable. A number of years ago, after a friend had a miscarriage, one of her good friends told her that if she improved her prayer life and got closer to God, she’d have a successful pregnancy.

Friends, I do not believe that woman was correct. My experience of God does not support her claim.

How about the idea, though, that God is behind our success?
Initially, this one seems easier to see. Sure, we believe that the blessings in our lives come from the God who made us. We may or may not see God’s action in our lives quite as clearly as the Israelites did when the Philistines were thrown into confusion, but consider this example.

Shortly after 9/11, stories started circulating about people who were supposed to be in the towers that morning, but weren’t. One man took his child to their first day of kindergarten and was late. Another person stopped to tie his shoe and missed the train, getting him to New York late enough that he wasn’t at his desk when the planes hit. Another person missed their flight that later crashed into the pentagon because they were stuck in traffic.

While I imagine that those people who weren’t in the towers that day did feel very thankful, I have a problem with circulating those stories as if God was looking out for those particular people.

Because we know the reality. Thousands of people died in those buildings and on those planes. Was God not looking out for them? Was God punishing them?

This punishment/reward understanding of God is something we should guard against. I believe it to be unhelpful and untrue. While it is how the Old Testament writers understood their experience of God, it is not how we have to. Because we experience God most clearly through the person of Jesus Christ.

I am not saying that Jesus made the Old Testament invalid or that God changed between the First and Second Testament.

But I am saying that because we know of Jesus of Nazareth, we can’t read the Old Testament without that knowledge. And our experience of God through Jesus is one of sacrificial love. God gave God’s very own child to the world in love.

So, where is God in our suffering, when the Philistines are at the gates?
Well, one answer is that God is suffering with us. Jesus became human, fully human, and lived and died, and succeeded and suffered. So, in all of the moments of our lives, God is present with us, and knows our pain. Because as Jesus, God suffered our pain.

We also could answer that God is re-creating and redeeming the world in both the good and the bad experiences of our lives. One of my favorite passages in Scripture is Romans chapter 8, but particularly this verse—“for we know that in all things, God is working together for good for those who love God and who are called together according to his purpose”.

This doesn’t mean that God is only present with us when we succeed. And it doesn’t mean that God causes bad things to happen as punishment. But it means that God’s redemptive powers are greater than the worst human suffering.

Listen to the rest of the 8th chapter of Romans:

What then are we to say about these things? If God is for us, who is against us?
He who did not withhold his own Son, but gave him up for all of us, will he not with him also give us everything else?
Who will bring any charge against God’s elect? It is God who justifies.
Who is to condemn? It is Christ Jesus, who died, yes, who was raised, who is at the right hand of God, who indeed intercedes for us.
Who will separate us from the love of Christ? Will hardship, or distress, or persecution, or famine, or nakedness, or peril, or sword?
As it is written,
“For your sake we are being killed all day long;
we are accounted as sheep to be slaughtered.”
No, in all these things we are more than conquerors through him who loved us.
For I am convinced that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor rulers, nor things present, nor things to come, nor powers, nor height, nor depth, nor anything else in all creation, will be able to separate us from the love of God in Christ Jesus our Lord.”

The truth is, there has been suffering in each of our lives, and there will be more. And there may be days when it feels like you are being punished for no good reason. And well meaning people might even suggest ways for you to earn God’s favor.

But the truth is, we have received God’s favor. Through the unexplainable grace of God, we have received the gift of new life in Christ. It isn’t because we earned it or because God likes us more than God likes someone else.

It is because God so loved the world that God gave his only son.

So as we’re reading through these Old Testament texts, keep reading them through your knowledge of the grace we’ve received, and remember that God doesn’t cause suffering, but God is present with us in our suffering. Amen.


Dynasty

September 21, 2009


A Sermon Preached at Southminster
September 20, 2009

1 Samuel 2:26-36

In the Year of the Bible, we start in on reading the narratives of First and Second Samuel this week. Which means you can give yourselves a pat on the back for surviving Joshua and Judges! I love these books and I hope you will too. This narrative is a page turner! And I find a lot of connections between life in the text and life today whenever I read it.

In the section immediately preceding what we read this morning, Hannah brings her son, Samuel to the temple. She is one more of the barren women of the Old Testament who have prayed and prayed for children. When the Lord gives her Samuel, she offers him back to the Lord and he is raised in the temple by the Priest Eli. Hannah’s story will show up in the lectionary, so we’ll visit her story again. Don’t race past Hannah’s story as you read 1 Samuel.

Eli is the priest at Shiloh and he seems to be a decent priest, but his children are not. Remember that during the Exodus, the family of Aaron become the priests. They are from the tribe of Levi, so it is the Levites, as a clan, who fill the priestly function. They don’t have tribal lands the same way the other tribes do. Eli is in this line of inherited priesthood. And God has promised Dynasty to them. Remember back in Exodus 28, and all of that language of “Aaron and his sons shall serve the Lord….and it shall be a perpetual ordinance for him and for his descendants after him….”

Well, generations have gone by, and listen to how Eli’s sons, Aaron’s great great grandsons, are filling God’s ordinance: from earlier in 1 Sam 2, beginning with verse 12:

“Now, the sons of Eli were scoundrels; they had no regard for the Lord or for the duties of the priests to the people. When anyone offered sacrifice, the priest’s servant would come, while the meat was boiling, with a three pronged fork in his hand, and he would thrust it deep into the pan, or kettle, or cauldron, or pot; all that the fork brought up the priest would take for himself. This is what they did at Shiloh to all the Israelites who came there…”

In the tradition of corrupt officials everywhere, Eli’s sons are skimming off the top. Literally, in this case, taking the best of the meat before it has even had the chance to be offered to God.

So God expresses God’s displeasure with the sons of Eli and decides that this particular dynasty is going to come to an end.

Now, as Americans who got rid of our monarch a few hundred years ago, I think we tend to associate dynasties with other people and other places. Because anyone can grow up to be President in the US! But there are lots of dynasties that aren’t political ones. So pay attention to where the potential dynasties may be in your life.

So don’t dismiss this story as something belonging to another age or to other people.

So, we have this story of Eli and his scoundrel sons who didn’t care so much for either the Lord or for their duties to the people of the Lord. And this story is woven into the narrative about Samuel. Samuel, who was not from the tribe of Levi but from the tribe of Ephraim. Samuel, who did not have any family connections or privilege. Samuel who surely had no expectations that he would become a priest. His future was as a servant in the temple.

These books bear Samuel’s name, but in truth, they are the beginnings of the narrative of the kings of Israel. King Saul, King David. It is as if, before the crown is ever put on someone’s head, God wants us to remember that dynasties don’t always work out the way you want them too. The people, we’ll discover, will be begging for kings. And the grown man who has become priest Samuel will tell them, “you don’t know what you’re asking. This isn’t what you really want.”

And Samuel should know. Because he saw the heartbreak on his mentor Eli’s face whenever Eli thought of his scoundrel sons. Samuel was put in the unenviable position of being everything that Eli hoped and prayed his own children would be.

I think this story is also a reminder to us that while parents do bear all of the hurt and pain that result when their children are scoundrels, it isn’t always the parents fault. It certainly isn’t clear in this text that it is Eli’s fault. Eli was a good priest. He presumably taught his children how to live. He certainly told his children that they should change their evil ways. But they would not listen to the voice of their father.

There are many other similar texts in the Bible, and in our lives, that should be cautionary tales, helping us remember to be careful before assigning blame to parents for their childrens’ sins.

So, think of what it would have been like to be Samuel, growing up in that temple. You see your parents maybe a few times a year, so Eli really functions as your father. But Eli’s sons certainly don’t act like your brothers. You try to serve God faithfully, but you watch Eli’s sons stealing the best part of the offering, interfering in people’s worship. And whenever you get that look on your face, the one that makes your disgust with their behavior clear, they say to you, “sorry son of Ephraim. Too bad you weren’t born a Levite. And don’t go getting any ideas. You’ll never be priest. God has said that only Levites shall serve”.

Think just how aggravating that would be. Because they are right. They may be scoundrels, but they know their scripture. God DID say that Levites were to be the priests forever. And only Levites. There is no provision in the law for nice Benjaminites to be priests. No allowance for especially faithful Ephraimites to serve.

There it is, right there in the Bible. Only the sons of Aaron will be priests.

Perhaps that is why Eli’s sons acted the way they did. Because humans are not at our best when we think God has endorsed our positions uncritically. Perhaps mistaking God’s favor for their privilege is what leads the sons of Eli to be scoundrels.

But what does God do?

Therefore the LORD the God of Israel declares: ‘I promised that your family and the family of your ancestor should go in and out before me forever’; but now the LORD declares: ‘Far be it from me; for those who honor me I will honor, and those who despise me shall be treated with contempt.’

God is capable of changing God’s own mind.

Even if it has already been written as Scripture.

The problem for us, of course, is to figure out how to tell if God has changed God’s mind.

The people who argue that women shouldn’t be pastors, for instance, are trying to be faithful to God’s word, as they read it. Yet the Presbyterian Church, among others, determined years ago that God is still speaking to the church and that God is calling women and men to all ministries in the church.

Perhaps this text is a reminder to us to, as Gracie Allen once said, “never put a period where God has put a comma.” Because if we believe in a living God, then we should be expecting God to speak to us today. And even though the Canon of Scripture is closed—meaning there will never be a new book called, “The Gospel According to Marci” added to the New Testament—just because the Bible has already been written doesn’t mean God can’t use it to speak to us today as well. This is not a dead book but a living one.

But notice that in the text Samuel doesn’t get to be the one to decide to ignore the laws from Exodus and Leviticus. He never goes to Eli and says, “I’d like to be a priest. I don’t care what Leviticus says.”

It is, for better and for worse, not our decision.

It is God who decides.

And also notice that God didn’t remove the Scripture God was changing. Even though God made Samuel, the non-Levite, into a priest, God didn’t erase the chapters of the Torah that prescribed Levitical priests. It was still scripture then. It is still scripture today.

And the problem facing faithful Christians today is how do we know what God has decided?

I will not presume that my answer to that question is the right one. But I will say that we have a responsibility as God’s people to be listening for the answer.

William Sloane Coffin, the preacher and social activist I mentioned last week said,

“It is a mistake to look to the Bible to close a discussion; the Bible seeks to open one.”

So, friends, we need to be in discussion so that we may discern what God is saying to us today. Reading the Bible this year, and building that practice, is one way we participate in the discussion. Coming together in Christian community for study, conversation, worship and fellowship is another way to participate in the discussion.

Breaking cultural practices that encourage us to surround ourselves with people with whom we agree about everything is another part of the discussion. I don’t know if you know how rare a community we have here. Some of us are conservative and some of us are liberal. We come to this place from all different walks of life. And we love each other. Let’s promise to be careful with each other, hearing each other’s thoughts, valuing others’ opinions. And let’s not be like the world around us that only sees value in conversation if it will make the other person change their mind.

Because I truly believe that is how we will know what God is saying to the church. When we truly listen to each other and each others’ experience, I trust it will be easier to discern where God is calling us.

And one last thing to note from the text today. Eli’s sons didn’t just get struck by lightening the minute the messenger from God made the declaration that they were out. It took time. Samuel had to grow up. God’s time is not our time. That isn’t an excuse to not work for change. But it is a reminder that if things don’t happen immediately, that is no reason to stop trying.

In this text God says, “those who honor me, I will honor”. In that, I hear great promise that if we humbly seek God and listen for God, we may become a part of the conversation. Amen.


Fool Squad

September 7, 2009

A Sermon preached at Southminster Presbyterian Church
September 6, 2009

I Corinthians 4:6-21

I love the writings of the apostle Paul. I don’t always like how Christians use his writings, but I can’t control that. I will say that when you hear Paul used to defend strict legalism, or to keep God’s grace from people, to keep people out, that his writings are being misused. Because Paul, again and again, seeks to build up the Body of Christ. And seeks to do so by including more and more people into the Body.

And, of course, Paul wasn’t really writing for us. He didn’t know we’d be studying his letters 2,000 years after they were written. He certainly had no idea he was writing Scripture. To Paul, Scripture was the Hebrew Bible, our Old Testament. Paul was writing letters to actual people. To congregations he either had started or was going to be visiting. He was writing to address specific issues in the lives of these churches.

Your Year of the Bible readings started you out with Paul’s final letter—the Letter to the Romans. That letter was written to people he’d not yet met, and serves as an introduction of sorts to who Paul is and what Paul understands about how God is at work through Jesus Christ.

Yesterday, we began reading 1 Corinthians. And the Letter to the church in Corinth, is very different from Romans. It is an earlier letter. It is not, however, his first letter to this church, because in it, he refers to an earlier letter. (1 Cor 5:9—I wrote to you in my letter.)

Corinth was a Roman colony and an important port city on a trade route. Paul is writing to people in an urban setting, with many different religions and gods with which the people would have been familiar.

The “church” in Corinth during the time Paul was writing to them, would have met in homes, and not in separate church buildings, as we do today. He founded the church around 51 CE. And, after he left to visit another church, there was at least one other leader—Appollos.

And the people to whom Paul is writing, are, apparently, having trouble getting along. From earlier in the letter:

Now I appeal to you, brothers and sisters, by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that all of you be in agreement and that there be no divisions among you, but that you be united in the same mind and the same purpose. (1 Cor 1:10)

All of the reasons for their divisions are unclear, but it seems as if some have decided that Apollos was a better leader than Paul. And so Paul seems to be writing them back to establish some authority. As you read the earlier chapters of this letter, Paul acknowledges that he’s not as good of a public speaker as Apollos is, but he makes it clear that isn’t the point. Both Apollos and Paul are working for something bigger than themselves. They aren’t in this so that people will follow them. They are doing this so that people will follow God! He wants them to rise above their differences and be united as the body of Christ so that God’s work can be done through them.

Chapter 4 is a continuation of the argument begun earlier in the letter that Paul has unique authority with them and that they should not just listen to what he has to say, but they should model their lives on his example.

But not on his example of wisdom, strength, or public speaking. They are to follow him in his weakness, foolishness, and lack of public acclaim.

So, even though we are just reading chapter 4 today, know that you need the context of the entire letter to allow Paul to build his argument. And remember that while Paul may not have been a good public speaker, he was a brilliant writer. He was well versed in the styles of rhetoric used in his culture. He is great at building up his argument in a way that gets people to start patting themselves on the back and then he will pull the rug out from under them, exposing the fallacies of their reasoning.

As I read over these words again and again this week, I couldn’t help but hear Paul writing these words to us today. “so that none of you will be puffed up in favor of one against another.”

I’ll likely get in trouble for wading again into politics, but I just can’t help it. Truly, seriously, I am not expecting that you should agree with me about any political beliefs. But I am appalled and dismayed that the political conversation has broken down to such a degree in our nation that we no longer even want to talk to each other.

From the news this week:

–A person in favor of healthcare reform bit off a finger of a counter-protester this week at a healthcare rally.

–Some politicians are saying they won’t even listen to President Obama’s address to the nation this week because they don’t agree with what he has to say, even before he says it.

–Parents are pulling their kids out of school rather than let them hear an address by the President of the United States.

On both sides of the political spectrum, we are reacting out of fear and anger, without really listening to what people are saying and seemingly with little regard for what is at stake.

Liz Emrich, in an editorial at Salon.com summed it up well, when writing about the kerfluffle over school children being addressed by the president:

“What we really teach our children when we tell them that they shouldn’t hear the words of their President, because he isn’t espousing the party line we personally agree with, is that our identity as Americans is somehow less important than our identity as partisans. It’s one more nail in the coffin of our national identity, our collective pride in our political system. We should be teaching our children to respect our President, even when we disagree with him. And the first step to respecting someone is listening to what they have to say.” (http://open.salon.com/blog/liz_emrich/2009/09/04/in_case_you_hadnt_noticed_hes_the_president)

I don’t know if she knows it, but Emrich is recapping Paul’s argument in First Corinthians. Whether you identify with Apollos or you identify with Paul, you have a larger obligation as a follower of Christ to come together and work together to build up the Body of Christ.

“Who sees anything different in you?”, Paul asks. Another way to translate that verse is “who makes you different from one another?”

“What do you have that you did not receive? And if you received it, why do you boast as if it were not a gift?”

I posted a link on Facebook yesterday to the editorial I mentioned. And the comments turned into an illustration of 1 Corinthians. People started flinging around words like “liberal” and “conservative” as if they were weapons. People weren’t listening to each other’s ideas and opinions. I posted the article to call us back into conversation, yet people just kept on ranting at each other.

How did we get here?

I’m not a Pollyanna, really. I know that there are real differences of opinion out there. But don’t we still have things in common too?

And Paul wasn’t telling the Corinthians to pretend that they agree about everything. Remember that unity in Christ is not the same as uniformity.

He’s calling them to a higher purpose. And reminding them that the things that divide us—Paul, Apollos, Republicans, Democrats—are secondary issues.

“What do you have that you did not receive?” He asks them. “And if you received it, why do you boast as if it were not a gift?”

Friends, what do we have that we did not receive?

This week, as two members of our congregation have passed from this life to the next, I’ve been very mindful of the gift of life, as well as the gift of life in Christ. And as I tried to minister to you through a difficult time, you ministered to me with your kind and supportive emails, prayers, and hugs. So I’ve also been very mindful of the gift of community this week.

Not a community where we always agree with everything the others say. But a community where we love each other despite what the others say. That is why Southminster is the community it is—because we all share the gift of new life in Christ, we are able to come together as community, overcoming our differences.

That’s what Paul wants for Corinth. He wants them to see their very lives as gifts. Because when you do that, you respond in gratitude.

But to do that requires seeing things differently than the world sees. We’ll see this again and again in Paul’s letters.

The wisdom of this world will only make us fight with each other about who is right and who is wrong. The foolishness of God, however, will make us look at each other with different priorities, calling us into community, giving us the gift of true wisdom.

But imitating Paul is not easy.

Because he doesn’t tell us to be successful and well spoken and appreciated by the world.

Listen again to how they are supposed to be imitators of Paul:

We are fools for the sake of Christ, but you are wise in Christ. We are weak, but you are strong. You are held in honor, but we in disrepute. To the present hour we are hungry and thirsty, we are poorly clothed and beaten and homeless, and we grow weary from the work of our own hands. When reviled, we bless; when persecuted, we endure; when slandered, we speak kindly. We have become like the rubbish of the world, the dregs of all things, to this very day.”

He also says, “the kingdom of God depends not on talk but on power”. Which is sort of odd, since he’s always telling people to be weak, and not strong. But I think what he’s doing is reminding them that the foolishness of the gospel is not about talk. It is about how it lives out in our lives.

What if we really were to be imitators of Paul, who is, of course, imitating Jesus?

What if, when we were slandered, we spoke kindly in response?

What if, when people reviled us, we blessed them?

Have you seen the bumper sticker, “Love your enemies—it messes with their heads”?

In some ways, that’s what Paul is calling us to do.

Because it is hard to have an argument when only one person is screaming. It is hard to escalate a situation when only one person is rising to the bait. It is hard to think that the wisdom of this world is wise when you look around through God’s eyes and see the pain it is causing us.

As we read through this letter, and the ones to come, pay attention to how Paul speaks of foolishness and wisdom. Notice how the unity of the body of Christ matters so much to him. Notice how the gift of faith that comes through Jesus Christ is supposed to transform how we live our lives.

And may we learn how to be fools for Christ.

Amen.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 511 other followers